Disussion by Group Jeans
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland
PUK Bookworms
Welcome to PUK Bookworms; a magazine dedicated to student book reviews at the Prefectural University of Kumamoto.
Welcome to PUK Bookworms; a magazine dedicated to student book reviews at the Prefectural University of Kumamoto.
Disussion by Group Jeans
9 responses to “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland”
I think that threre was one prpblems which is lack of disccusions about individual opinions in this discussion.Every participants clamed that the story of Alice`s Adventure might be her dreem or delusion, and all opinions was very interesting. Houever,in the part of exchangeing of thire views,the lack of discussion was recognized. So,I think this discussion will need to do more rebuttals in oder to be critical.
After listening your discussion, I found one small point to improve. That point is to make the discussion more active. I felt that you are just reading a script, so I suggest that you should have confidence. If you do that, your discussion is really interesting and exciting.
I thought more discussion about the opinions the speakers told was necessary. This is a problem because it is hard to know deeply of the opinion if only one person mentions it. One way to fix this problem is to add if the other speakers agree or disagree with the opinion. If you do that, your audience can understand more about your opinions.
I think this group’s discussion can communicate each other. However, I want they to show respond’s idea again when they ask a question. I was confused because their idea is similar. They should confirm their thinkings. If you do that, they can advance their understanding.
I couldn’t hear several parts because a few students talked a little fast. This is a problem because being unable to listen to the most important part confuses listeners. One way to fix this problem is to speak more slowly. If you do that, listeners will understand what you want to tell them the most.
I thought we should have spoken more loudly and added intonation because this was like just reading aloud script. The ways to fix these problems are speak more loudly with intonation and not to decide who is suppose this opinion as we did so this time. If we do that, audiences will be able to hear our voice more clearly and make them feel like they are participating in this discussion, and their own new opinions may emerge.
I felt the theme was unspecific in your presentation. This is a problem because the focus is scattered, and your opinions may not be deep. One way to fix this problem is to expand the discussion from one scene. If you do that, you will discuss more deeply.
I think it was not enough that they didn’t discuss each other. It is the problem because we can talk deeper by thinking other people’s opinion. I think that indicating “For and against” to other people is an effective way to solve the problem. If they try this, they can discuss more deeply.
I think that the comment or question part is a problem. This is because they did not ask questions related to opposing opinions. One way to fix the problem is to ask something about what others stated. If you do that, the discussion will be deeper than now.