Welcome to PUK Bookworms; a magazine dedicated to student book reviews at the Prefectural University of Kumamoto.
Anne of Green Gables
A discussion by Group Jeans
9 responses to “Anne of Green Gables”
I thought that our discussion doesn’t have any emotions because we speaked without intonation. It sounds like reading script. I think we should talk with intonation. Also, we have to give some agreement. By doing so, our discussion will become active.
I thought that you should have spoken about the relation of the characters. This is problem because listeners cannot understand the relation of the characters. One way to fix this problem is to prepare the short summary. If you do that, listeners can catch the story and the relation of the characters more clearly.
I think our discussion was difficult to understand because there was no division between those in favor and those in opposition to a single agenda, and each person was not in a clear position. I think we should make a clear agenda so that people who are listening to this discussion can understand it more easily. Also, we should speak about the details of this book.
After listening to our discussion, I found one problem to be solved. It is that each comments which support our opinions were too long and as a result, audiences may confused and not be able to follow our discussion. One way to solve this problem is simplify our comments and intonating keywords or phrases which we want audiences to listen to carefully. If we solve this problem, our discussion will be more comfortable for audiences.
I think the problem was that they talked about the reasons of each alphabet of MBTI, and it was a little long. This is a problem because it may make your audience tired. To fix this, I think it is better to summarize the personalities in a few sentences and then show the reasons. If you do this it will be easier to listen to your opinions.
I think that they didn’t describe about characters and the summary of the book in detail. It is a problem because I couldn’t understand almost all of characters who people discussed. I think that adding some explanations about these things is an effective way to solve the problem. If they do this, we can understand their discussion easily.
When I was listening to this group’s discussion. I found the topic of conversation difficult. This is because mbti is popular in recent years, and personality types are classified a lot. That is why one person’s opinion is getting longer and the discussion is getting more complicated. So this group should change the topic more easily and relate it to the story. I think this will increase the conversation and clarify the topic.
Hearing your discussion, it is difficult to know who has similar opinions about Anne’s MBTI. This is a problem because your audience may want to know the outline before each person talks about the reason why you think so. Before you express your reasons, everyone should express what you think about Anne’s MBTI, and classify them. If you do that, your audience will understand the difference of your opinions easily.
After listening to your discussion, I found that some of your members sometimes lost for words and your discussion seems to be a little long. I think this is a problem because the listeners won’t be able to catch the conversation flow and it might lead to incomprehension or misunderstanding of your discussion. One way to fix this problem is to use the more elementary word in discussion. If you do so, you will find the words to tell your opinion more smoothly.
9 responses to “Anne of Green Gables”
I thought that our discussion doesn’t have any emotions because we speaked without intonation. It sounds like reading script. I think we should talk with intonation. Also, we have to give some agreement. By doing so, our discussion will become active.
I thought that you should have spoken about the relation of the characters. This is problem because listeners cannot understand the relation of the characters. One way to fix this problem is to prepare the short summary. If you do that, listeners can catch the story and the relation of the characters more clearly.
I think our discussion was difficult to understand because there was no division between those in favor and those in opposition to a single agenda, and each person was not in a clear position. I think we should make a clear agenda so that people who are listening to this discussion can understand it more easily. Also, we should speak about the details of this book.
After listening to our discussion, I found one problem to be solved. It is that each comments which support our opinions were too long and as a result, audiences may confused and not be able to follow our discussion. One way to solve this problem is simplify our comments and intonating keywords or phrases which we want audiences to listen to carefully. If we solve this problem, our discussion will be more comfortable for audiences.
I think the problem was that they talked about the reasons of each alphabet of MBTI, and it was a little long. This is a problem because it may make your audience tired. To fix this, I think it is better to summarize the personalities in a few sentences and then show the reasons. If you do this it will be easier to listen to your opinions.
I think that they didn’t describe about characters and the summary of the book in detail. It is a problem because I couldn’t understand almost all of characters who people discussed. I think that adding some explanations about these things is an effective way to solve the problem. If they do this, we can understand their discussion easily.
When I was listening to this group’s discussion. I found the topic of conversation difficult. This is because mbti is popular in recent years, and personality types are classified a lot. That is why one person’s opinion is getting longer and the discussion is getting more complicated. So this group should change the topic more easily and relate it to the story. I think this will increase the conversation and clarify the topic.
Hearing your discussion, it is difficult to know who has similar opinions about Anne’s MBTI. This is a problem because your audience may want to know the outline before each person talks about the reason why you think so. Before you express your reasons, everyone should express what you think about Anne’s MBTI, and classify them. If you do that, your audience will understand the difference of your opinions easily.
After listening to your discussion, I found that some of your members sometimes lost for words and your discussion seems to be a little long. I think this is a problem because the listeners won’t be able to catch the conversation flow and it might lead to incomprehension or misunderstanding of your discussion. One way to fix this problem is to use the more elementary word in discussion. If you do so, you will find the words to tell your opinion more smoothly.