Welcome to PUK Bookworms; a magazine dedicated to student book reviews at the Prefectural University of Kumamoto.
The Prisoner of Zenda
A discussion by Group Tamagochi
6 responses to “The Prisoner of Zenda”
I have a problem about your discussion. It is little short. Your opinions are very good so you have to widen the subject. If you do that, listener can get more learning of the story.
I thought that you should have shared the differences of your opinions. This is a problem because having the same opinion doesn’t mean to have the same reason. One way to fix this problem is to summarize why you agree with the opinion. If you do that, you will be able to share more concrete opinions with other people.
When I was listening the summary of the story, I couldn’t understand that the feeling of characters in the story. I think it is a problem because people become difficult to understand why characters chose this choice. I think that to contain the character’s feeling into the summary is effective way. By doing this, people become easier to understand the story.
I thought our discussion was too short. It is a problem because we have not really been able to go into much depth on the topic. We should have more counterarguments and questions. In addition, we should understand the contents of the book we choose more. Then we can have a more meaningful discussion.
After listening our discussion, I found one problem in our discussion. It is that the amount of talking should be divided equally. Because we should insist our own opinion more each other. The way of solving this problem, we should prepare harder. If we can do that, our discussion will be improved.
I think the problem of this discussion is the response after Kota’s objection. It was a little confusing because it was a objection to Shindo but Kotomi responded it. One way to fix this problem is to add her opinion after Shindo’s response. If you do this, it will be more easy to follow your discussion.
6 responses to “The Prisoner of Zenda”
I have a problem about your discussion. It is little short. Your opinions are very good so you have to widen the subject. If you do that, listener can get more learning of the story.
I thought that you should have shared the differences of your opinions. This is a problem because having the same opinion doesn’t mean to have the same reason. One way to fix this problem is to summarize why you agree with the opinion. If you do that, you will be able to share more concrete opinions with other people.
When I was listening the summary of the story, I couldn’t understand that the feeling of characters in the story. I think it is a problem because people become difficult to understand why characters chose this choice. I think that to contain the character’s feeling into the summary is effective way. By doing this, people become easier to understand the story.
I thought our discussion was too short. It is a problem because we have not really been able to go into much depth on the topic. We should have more counterarguments and questions. In addition, we should understand the contents of the book we choose more. Then we can have a more meaningful discussion.
After listening our discussion, I found one problem in our discussion. It is that the amount of talking should be divided equally. Because we should insist our own opinion more each other. The way of solving this problem, we should prepare harder. If we can do that, our discussion will be improved.
I think the problem of this discussion is the response after Kota’s objection. It was a little confusing because it was a objection to Shindo but Kotomi responded it. One way to fix this problem is to add her opinion after Shindo’s response. If you do this, it will be more easy to follow your discussion.