Discussed by Tamagochi
Romeo and Juliet
PUK Bookworms
Welcome to PUK Bookworms; a magazine dedicated to student book reviews at the Prefectural University of Kumamoto.
Welcome to PUK Bookworms; a magazine dedicated to student book reviews at the Prefectural University of Kumamoto.
Discussed by Tamagochi
9 responses to “Romeo and Juliet”
I felt the moderator in this group did great job, because he commented after someone claimed their opinions and explained what is going to be talked so as audiences can understand the topic what they are talking. The problem was giggle. I know this was the first time to recording and we all were nervous, but it was a little bit difficult to hear. One way to fix this problem is having a confidence. If you do so, your audience will have a chance to understand what your saying.
I thought more information about the discussion theme was necessary. This is a problem because the audience can’t understand your purpose or why the discussion is important. One way to fix this problem is to add why you chose the theme. If you do that, you audience can understand more about your discussion.
I think this group’s discussion theme is most important character, but I think they should decide more detail view. This is a problem because the character’s importance is difference by choosing the scene. I think they have to determine the scene. If they do that, they can learn the story.
I found one good point and one trouble. Good point is all presenters speak with confidence, so I could listen your discussion with comfortably. Trouble point is many people of this book appeared in this discussion, so I could not understand participant’s idea easily, so I think you should explain about the character in this book at the first. if you do that, audience can understand your dscussion easily.
I thought the participants need to discuss matters. This is a problem because you cannot share your opinions more deeply, and cannot understand why some participants have different opinion. One way to fix this problem is to ask why you have the opinion each other. If you do that, your discussion will be more active.
I thought your group’s process was smooth and I could understand your theme. However, I found one problem after hearing the discussion. I think your group’s discussion could be more natural because it is difficult to give honest opinions in formal conversations. I think one way to fix this problem is not to decide the whole discussion process so much. If you do that, you can listen to a variety of opinions in your group’s discussion.
I think we should have given an outline of this story or character introduction. This is because we started with the topic “who is the most pitiful character?”, but it’s not easy to understand who the character is. In particular, I skipped Paris’s explanation by mistake. One way to fix this problem is to add an introduction about the book. If we do that, our audience will easily understand who we are talking about.
I think that they talked about some topics in the discussion. I think it is the problem because they didn’t talk about specific topic in more detail. I think that focusing on one topic is effective way to solve this problem. If they try this, I think their discussion will be more specific.
I felt it would be good to talk about a simple plot first. This is because those who hear it for the first time suddenly hear arguments about pitiful characters. And for my personal reflection, I thought it would be better to talk more briskly. By doing so, I think the discussion will be easy for the listener to understand.